Twenty Minute Observation Upheld in DWI Cases
Superior Court Judge Mitchel Ostrer of Mercer County held on March 5, in State v. Nagorniak, that the State must prove by clear and convincing evidence that a defendant was observed by a police officer for a minimum of 20 minutes before a breathalyzer test was taken.
Ostrer reversed the Lawrence Township municipal Court’s admission of Alcotest results that convicted Lubomir Nagorniak, finding the state did not meet its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that he was observed continuously for 20 minutes. Two officers were alternately watching Nagorniak but one of them could not recall what he saw, the judge found.
“The purpose of this observation is to ensure that the defendant has not ingested or regurgitated substances that would taint the breath sample. (The officer’s) failure of recollection defeated the purpose of the observation,” Judge Ostrer wrote.
This is just one of the requirements that the New Jersey Supreme Court outlined in their seminal opinion in State v. Chun, 194 N.J. 54 (2008). There are other important steps that law enforcement must take in order to properly prosecute a New Jersey DWI case.
If you have been charged with DWI in New Jersey, contact the top criminal defense attorneys in New Jersey at Lependorf & Silverstein. We know the “ins and outs” of the system and can make sure that you are properly represented. Contact us today at (609) 240-0040 for a free consultation.